Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1926No. 4824PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
Defendants were convicted under two counts of an indictment which charged, in count 1, that “on or about November 3, 3925, in the city and county of San Francisco, in the Northern district of California, they did * * * violate a requirement of the Aet of December 17, 3.914, as amended February 24, 1919 [40 Stat. 1057], in that they did then and there knowingly * * * and felouiously purchase, sell, dispense, and distribute a certain derivative of opium, to wit, * * * morphine, * * * which said morphine was not then and there in or from the original stamped packages…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Powers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Wong Lung Sing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Ng Choy Fong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Willsman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Nathan Shurman and Louis Chebatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Ambrose Badillo Caudillo, Joe Romero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Parmagini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Robert Johnson and Dona Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Mullaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.