Legal Opinion

Ambrose Badillo Caudillo, Joe Romero v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1958No. 15734_1PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

Caudillo appeals from his conviction on three counts (two of sale and one of possession), and Romero appeals from his conviction on two counts (both of possession) , charging violations of 21 U.S.C.A. § 176a. 1 Appellants were tried and convicted by a jury.

21 U.S.C.A. § 176a prohibits the importation of marihuana, or the receipt, sale or concealment, or the facilitation in any manner of the sale or transportation or concealment of such illegally imported marihuana. It also contains, after a description of the proscribed crime, the following language:

“Whenever on trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  5. Pon Wing Quong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. Phillip Andrew ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. John Michael Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API