Legal Opinion

Willsman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1923No. 5711PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff in error Henry Wülsman and one Bert Grant were convicted of a violation'of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act (Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q). They thereupon sued out a writ of error to this court. The defendant Grant subsequently abandoned the prosecution of the writ and is serving his sentence in Leavenworth.

The indictment contained four counts. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendants upon the first and second counts and submitted the third and fourth counts, with instructions that the defendants could be convicted upon one only of the two counts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Frazier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State v. DrewSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  4. State v. WarfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Sullivan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Frank Anthony Cellino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Grantello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. United States v. ChiarelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  5. People v. SinclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API