Legal Opinion
Richardson Camera Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 13, 1972No. 126-71PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
In this case involving a supply contract, the Government has filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Buie 163(b) (1) in response to the plaintiff’s petition to this court following an order to dismiss entered by the *660Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA No. 13895). The petition concerns a contract (No. 3037) entered into by the plaintiff, Richardson Camera Company, and the Central Intelligence Agency in June 1961 for three items: a film viewer, a reader, and a counter. After several changes and subsequent agreements, the contracting officer on April 2, 1965,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Moran Bros., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Maney Aircraft Parts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Tapper & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- William Green Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Fraass Surgical Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Rivera Agredano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Wickham Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Bennie Collins v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.