Legal Opinion

Fraass Surgical Mfg. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 22, 1978No. 343-73PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on

defendant’s motion, filed November 10, 1977, under Rule 141(b), moving that the court adopt, as the basis for its judgment in this case, the recommended decision of Trial Judge David Schwartz, filed September 30, 1977, pursuant to Rule 134(h), plaintiff having failed to file a notice of intention to except or exceptions thereto and the time for so filing pursuant to the Rules of the court having expired. Upon consideration thereof, without oral argument, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it hereby…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Sperry Flight Systems Division of Sperry Rand Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  4. Chris Berg, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Loesch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. Gregory Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  3. Utility Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  4. Timber Investors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  5. Edwards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API