Hawley v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEVER, Justice.
This ease involves a joint undertaking to sell cocaine. Appellant Robert Wall was convicted of the sale of a “narcotic drug,” cocaine, in violation of AS 17.10.010. 1 Appellant Timothy Hawley was convicted of an attempted sale and a sale of cocaine in violation of the same statute. They appeal their convictions, alleging numerous errors. They contend that: (1) the existence of a joint undertaking was not established by sufficient independent evidence and, therefore, statements made by a co-defendant were not admissible against them; (2) the evidence was insufficient…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Elson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Contreras v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. FairchildWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Dobos v. IngersollAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.