Legal Opinion

Hawley v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1980No. 4200, 4273PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

This ease involves a joint undertaking to sell cocaine. Appellant Robert Wall was convicted of the sale of a “narcotic drug,” cocaine, in violation of AS 17.10.010. 1 Appellant Timothy Hawley was convicted of an attempted sale and a sale of cocaine in violation of the same statute. They appeal their convictions, alleging numerous errors. They contend that: (1) the existence of a joint undertaking was not established by sufficient independent evidence and, therefore, statements made by a co-defendant were not admissible against them; (2) the evidence was insufficient…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Elson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Contreras v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. FairchildWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dobos v. IngersollAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API