Legal Opinion

Moses v. Bartholomew

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1953No. 454PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

The assignments of error present this question for decision: Is the finding of fact of the full commission that the deceased was an employee of the Home Oil Company at the time he received the personal injuries from which he died supported by competent evidence?

The following rules are well settled in respect to proceedings coming within the purview of the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act:

1. Full fact-finding authority is vested in the industrial commission. G.S. 97-84. In exercising this authority, the industrial commission, like any' other trier of facts, is the sole judge of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Ballenger v. Burris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API