Legal Opinion
Williams v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 16, 2001No. Nos. 99-1572, 00-1254, 00-1255PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER. Dissenting Opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge PLAGER.
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia holding that Plaintiffs Spencer Williams,, et al. (“the Judges”) are entitled to back pay and future cost-of-living pay increases under the Ethics Reform Act of 1989. See Williams v. United States, 48 F.Supp.2d. 52, 65 (1999). In the four years involved in this case, Congress enacted legislation providing cost-of-living pay increases for federal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Evans v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Philadelphia v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Microchip Technology Incorporated v. U.S. Philips Corporation and Philips Electronics North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Thomas J. Kuzma, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- District of Columbia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Beer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.