Legal Opinion
Microchip Technology Incorporated v. U.S. Philips Corporation and Philips Electronics North America Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 13, 2004No. 03-1478PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Appellants U.S. Philips Corporation and Philips Electronics North America Corporation (collectively “Philips”) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona denying Philips’ motion to compel arbitration. Microchip Tech. Inc. v. U.S. Philips Corp., No. 01-CV-2090-PHX-PGR; 03-CV-0272-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. June 13, 2003). Because the district court properly denied Philips’ motion to compel arbitration, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Reduced to the essentials, the background for this case may be simply stated. Philips is the owner of U.S. Patent Nos.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Bill Hansen v. Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Qualcomm Incorporated v. Nokia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Exigent Technology, Inc. v. Atrana Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ansari v. Qwest Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.