Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bell Telephone Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1946No. Appeal, 105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, P. J.,

This appellant, defendant in a trespass action growing out of a collision of two motor vehicles, complains of the refusal of the court to enter a judgment in its favor, n. o. v., on the ground that the plaintiff driver of the automobile was guilty of contributory negligence. Appellant also contends that if entry of judgment in its favor is denied, a new trial should be granted as the judge was guilty of error in charging as to certain points of law which bore no relation to the evidence. Neither of these positions is sustainable.

Viewing the evidence in the most…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. Merchants Baking CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Smith v. WistarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Lehner v. SchellhaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Reiser v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Ross v. ReigelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. McGavern v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Algeo v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API