Legal Opinion

Post v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1922No. Appeal, No. 202PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal, No. 202, Jan. T., 1922, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., March T., 1920, No. 3080, for defendant n. o. v., in case of Edith S. Post, widow of William H. Post, deceased, v. Maurice F. Richardson. Trespass for death of plaintiff’s husband. Before Ferguson, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $3,500. Judgment for defendant n. o. v. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was judgment, quoting it.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment, entered against her non obstante veredicto, in an action to recover damages for the death of her husband, resulting from the collision between a large sled on which he was coasting and defendant’s automobile.

The accident took place about nine thirty at night on the Lancaster Pike, part of the Lincoln Highway, on a snow-covered hill leading through or out of Berwyn. Plaintiff’s decedent, thirty-one years of age, was the steersman of the sled, which was steered with a wheel. He was seated on the front of the sled with six other…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Landry v. HubertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. Wilson v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Ferrell v. SolskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Bloom v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Shellenberger v. Reading Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API