Legal Opinion

Huber v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1946No. Appeals, 120 and 121PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This is an action in trespass brought by Carole Ann Huber, a minor, by Frank W. Huber, as guardian, and by Frank W. Huber and Mary R. Huber, parents, in their own right, to recover for injuries sustained by the child when a sled on which she was riding collided with an automobile driven by George B. Anderson, defendant.

The accident occurred at the right-angle “T” intersection of Piedmont Avenue and Ninth Alley, in the Borough of Dormont, at about 5:15 P.M. (war standard time) on January 12, 1943. Piedmont Avenue is 24 feet wide, paved with brick, and runs…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Zandras v. MoffettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Leslie v. CatanzaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Stubbs v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Post v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Idell v. DaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanrahan v. McClatchyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Fritchman v. Kirschman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API