Bates v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
The issue in this case is whether plaintiffs may invoke the damage and injunctive relief provisions of the Information Practices Act (Civ. Code, § 1798 1 et seq., IPA) in a dispute with the Franchise Tax Board (Board or FTB). We conclude that they may, but that plaintiffs’ damages claims are barred by the Government Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 900 et seq.). 2 We also conclude that the claims for injunctive relief based on violations relating to the assessment and collection of taxes rather than on violations of the IPA are barred by California Constitution, article XIII,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Lozada v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cornejo v. LightbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hurley v. Cal. Dep't of Parks & Recreation, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Moghadam v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.