Ex Parte Horn v. City of Birmingham
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
On January 30, 1998, this Court released an opinion in Exparte Horn, 718 So.2d 694 (Ala. 1998), wherein we held that the residents/plaintiffs involved in this litigation are entitled to recover attorney fees from the City of Birmingham (the City) under the "common-fund" or "common-benefit" theory.1 Following remand to the trial court, both parties filed discovery requests addressing the question of a proper amount of attorney fees. During the pendency of discovery, the residents filed a motion seeking an interim attorney fee in the amount of $300,000 and to compel discovery of certain items.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Odom v. HullSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- ALABAMA DEM v. Town of LowndesboroCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Weesner v. DiefenbachCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- City of Birmingham v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- City of Birmingham v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001