Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Horn v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 30, 1999No. 1971842 and 1980886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On January 30, 1998, this Court released an opinion in Exparte Horn, 718 So.2d 694 (Ala. 1998), wherein we held that the residents/plaintiffs involved in this litigation are entitled to recover attorney fees from the City of Birmingham (the City) under the "common-fund" or "common-benefit" theory.1 Following remand to the trial court, both parties filed discovery requests addressing the question of a proper amount of attorney fees. During the pendency of discovery, the residents filed a motion seeking an interim attorney fee in the amount of $300,000 and to compel discovery of certain items.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Odom v. HullSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ex Parte HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. ALABAMA DEM v. Town of LowndesboroCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Weesner v. DiefenbachCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. City of Birmingham v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. City of Birmingham v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API