Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Birmingham v. Horn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 17, 2001No. 1991455 and 1991558Published

1Concurrence

In Alabama, a party may recover attorney fees only when an award is authorized by statute, is provided for by contract, or is justified by a "special equity." Horn v. City of Birmingham, 718 So.2d 691, 692 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997), rev'd, Ex parte Horn, 718 So.2d 694 (Ala. 1998); see also Blankenship v. City of Hoover, 590 So.2d 245 (Ala. 1991). A court may award an attorney fee on the basis that it is justified by a special equity "where the plaintiff's efforts are successful in creating a fund out of which the fees may be paid, or when the efforts of the plaintiff's attorneys render a public…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maggie Bell Heathcoat, as Administratrix for the Estate of Leonard James Heathcoat, Deceased v. Karl Potts, Kenneth Rhoden, Clyde SnoddyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Johnny Mack Westbrook v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Ex Parte HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Bell v. the Birmingham News Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API