Legal Opinion

Ex Parte McNaughton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 28, 1998No. 1961708PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cindy L. McNaughton, the plaintiff in an action pending in the Jefferson Circuit Court, petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the circuit court to vacate its order compelling the arbitration of her claims against the defendant United Healthcare services, Inc. ("United"). McNaughton maintains that arbitration is inappropriate because the arbitration clause contained in her employee handbook and relied on by the trial court is not part of a legally binding contract. In the alternative, McNaughton argues that the arbitration clause is void under the doctrine of unconscionability/mutuality…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. VintsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Ex Parte WigintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Patrick Home Center, Inc. v. KarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. American General Finance, Inc. v. BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Munoz v. Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API