Dintruff v. Tuthill
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from order of Tates county judge. Action by John L. Dintruff against Clarence C. Tuthill, as surviving partner of the firm of Henry Tuthill & Son. From an order denying an application to vacate an attachment theretofore issued, defendant and certain third persons, who were not parties to the action, appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.
The application was founded on the papers on which the warrant was granted, and an affidavit of the third persons named, showing their interest in the property attached, acquired subsequently to the levy of the attachment. The first-mentioned papers consisted of a verified complaint in the action, which was on a promissory note, made to the plaintiff by the firm of Henry Tuthill & Son, of which the defendant was the sole surviving partner, and an affidavit of the plaintiff, which, after setting out his cause of action, continued as follows: “That the said defendant Clarence C. Tuthill, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Collins v. BeebeNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Manning v. BeckNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Arnot v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1890
- First National Bank v. Bushwick Chemical WorksNew York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roberts v. BurnsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
- Cronin v. CrooksNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Patch v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Smith, Perkins & Co. v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Garson v. BrumbergNew York Supreme Court · 1894