Cronin v. Crooks
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Rensselaer county. Action by John S. Cronin against Johanna C. Crooks. From an order vacating a warrant of attachment, and directing the delivery of the attached property to a person not a party to the action, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtMayham, P. J.
In this case a judge of this court, at chambers, granted a warrant of attachment, on an ex parte application of the *823plaintiff; and subsequently, on a motion made by the defendant on notice, but upon the affidavit used on the motion for the attachment, and the warrant of attachment issued by him, the same justice vacated such attachment, and the levy made thereunder by the sheriff, and, by the order vacating such warrant and levy, directed the sheriff to deliver the attached property to a person therein named. A summons in this action was issued, and served on the defendant with the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Collins v. BeebeNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Arnot v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1890
- Dintruff v. TuthillNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- First National Bank v. Bushwick Chemical WorksNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Rothschild v. MooneyNew York Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by5 opinions
- King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- V. G. Pfluke Co. v. PapuliasNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- Smith, Perkins & Co. v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Delaney v. BouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Cronin v. CrooksNew York Supreme Court · 1894