Legal Opinion

Murray v. Payne

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1933No. 31,323PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one of mandamus, commenced in this court on March 16, 1933, to compel the city clerk of Kansas City to carry out arrangements for holding a city election, contrary to an act which took effect March 13, 1933, dispensing with holding the election. The cause was heard on the application for the writ. The writ was denied, and the reasons for that judgment may be stated as briefly as possible.

■ The city is a city of the first class, operating under the commission form of government. In February, 1923, the following statute became…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Fowler v. BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Jordan v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Wilson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Jones v. GridleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Adkinson v. NoonanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Water District No. 1 v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. State Board of Education v. Commission of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Sugg v. Toulouse OliverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API