Legal Opinion

Jones v. Gridley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1878PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Sumner District Court. Quo warranto, brought by Cridley, to determine the right to the office of justice of the peace, which was claimed by both Jones and Cridley. Jones was in possession. The district court, at April Term 1877, decided in favor of Cridley, and rendered judgment of ouster against Jones, and the latter now brings the case here on error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

statement of the case. On the 10th of February 1877, Ansel Gridley filed his petition in the district court of Sumner county, against E. E. Jones, to obtain thg office of justice of *he Peace for Oxford township in said county, alleging, among other things, that Oxford township was duly organized as a municipal township in the month of October 1871,'and that the first general election for township officers held in said township was held on the first Tuesday of the month of April 1872; that at the general election of November 1876, Ansel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. BartlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. MathenySupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Odell v. DodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Adsit v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State v. EcholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Demaree v. ScatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Patterson v. LentzMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Griffith v. County Court of Merger CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API