Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Tindoll

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 15, 1966No. 19,101PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Kilday, Judge:

The appellant was convicted of four specifications of taking indecent liberties with a female under the age of sixteen, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for three years. Intermediate appellate authorities approved the conviction and the board of review reduced the period of confinement to eighteen months.

Our grant of appellant’s petition was limited to specification four and the law officer’s instruction with regard…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. Bird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. United States v. NoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  5. United States v. MarkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. FrenchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. BriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. CottrillCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. StrodeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API