Legal Opinion
Feezor v. Siceloff
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 1, 1950No. 669PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The defendants challenge the correctness of the ruling below solely on the ground that the Board of Commissioners of Davidson County is without legal authority to grant the request of the plaintiffs. In our opinion the challenge cannot be sustained.
A county board of education has the authority “to consolidate schools located in the same district, and, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to consolidate school districts, over which the board has full control, whenever and wherever in its judgment the consolidation will better serve the educational interests of the county or any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- School Commissioners v. Board of Aldermen & TreasurerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Atkins v. . McAdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Waldrop v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Venable v. School Committee of Pilot MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Board of Education v. . ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Constantian v. Anson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Painter v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Dilday v. Beaufort County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Kistler v. Board of Education of Randolph CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Ricker v. Board of Education of Millard County School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.