Legal Opinion

McGlothlen v. Mills

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 13, 1936No. 43255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

Plaintiff’s action is in three counts. The first count, generally stated, is a count charging the defendant with criminal conversation with the wife of the plaintiff and also with alienating her affections. The same matters are, in substance, alleged in the second count.

A demurrer was sustained to the first count, and complaint is made of the ruling thereon. This complaint has no merit. The criminal conversation is alleged to have occurred some twenty years before the bringing of this action, and as to that matter the demurrer was rightfully sustained. As to the balance of that count,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Fratini v. CasliniSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
  3. Hardwick v. HardwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Riggs v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Acuff v. SchmitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. Lampe v. Lagomarcino-Grupe CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  3. Acuff v. SchmitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Lampe v. Lagomarcino-Grupe CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API