Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. Kuo
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
MARTIN J. JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is Defendants Mali Kuo (“Kuo”), Douglas Watson (“Watson”), and Digital Video Systems, Inc.’s (“DVS”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. 1 Plaintiffs Glenbrook Capital Limited Partnership (“Glenbrook”) opposes the motion. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The current shareholder action arises from Defendants’ alleged act of selling substantially all of DVS’s assets…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Cutera Securities Litigation v. ConnersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Nesbitt Bellevue Property LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Biliouris v. Sundance Resources, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
- In Re Atlas Mining Co., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.