State v. . McKnight
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
On the record as it came from the recorder’s court, the defendant was entitled to a trial de novo in the Superior Court. Ch. 338, sec. 3, Private Laws 1909. The solicitor sought to show by evidence dehors that the defendant entered a plea of guilty in the recorder’s court, and that, therefore, the appeal was only on matters of law, e.g., sufficiency of warrant, validity of statute, or legality of judgment. S. v. Warren, 113 N. C., 683, 18 S. E., 498. Compare S. v. Ingram, 204 N. C., 557, 168 S. E., 837. Without resorting to certiorari or recordari, the judge undertook to determine the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- State v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- State v. . PasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- State v. . IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Neal v. . CowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. . AbbottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- In Re SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . CrandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. CrandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.