Legal Opinion

State v. . Ingram

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Oukiam.

The defendants offered no evidence. There is proof that they were engaged in the operation of a lottery. When arraigned in the municipal court Odell Norman pleaded guilty of the offense charged in the warrant, and in the absence of explanatory evidence is presumed to have understood the significance of his plea. His plea was admissible against him upon his trial in the Superior Court. 16 C. J., 630, sec. 1254('7). The trial court was therefore correct in refusing to dismiss the action. Exceptions to the admission of evidence and to the charge of the court comprise the remaining…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. State v. . CrandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. State v. CrandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Guy v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. State v. . McKnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API