Legal Opinion
In Re Mance
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 2005No. 04-BG-860PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility, in agreement with the Hearing Committee, has found that respondent, Robert W. Manee, neglected his client and committed other ethical violations in handling a criminal appeal. The Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record, see D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9(g)(1), and, indeed, there is no dispute as to the material facts. In short, after his client was convicted in Superior Court of aggravated assault while armed, mayhem while armed, and associated weapons offenses and sentenced to consecutive prison terms totaling thirty years to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re DunietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re SumnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re StowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re VohraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re AskewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.