Spaulding v. North San Francisco Homestead & Railroad
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from ail order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment enforcing a street assessment against a lot on Lombard Street.
The case was heard in Department, and the judgment was affirmed, and the facts of the case are stated in the opinion then rendered by Commissioner Gibson (filed July 8, 1890.) A hearing in Bank was ordered, because it was strenuously urged that the decision was in conflict with Mulligan v. Smith, 59 Cal. 206, and Kahn v. Supervisors, 79 Cal. 388. But, after argument on rehearing, and mature consideration, we are satisfied with the conclusions reached in Department.
*42Mulligan v. Smith and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mulligan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. HagarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Kahn v. Board of SupervisorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Turrill v. GrattanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Wilcox v. EngebretsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Stevenson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Schank v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.