Legal Opinion

Kurzman v. Steir

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 25, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

The plaintiff, Kurzman, brought an action in the Superior Court alleging that the defendant, Steir, had been unjustly enriched at his expense by the manner in which the First National State Bank of New Jersey (Bank) had exercised its rights with respect to shares of stock in SC A Services, Inc. (SCA). Kurzman, Steir, and one Thomas Viola had each pledged their stock as security for the Bank’s loan to one Christopher Recklitis who subsequently defaulted on his obligation. Although Kurzman had pledged a greater number of shares than Steir, Steir’s shares were sufficent to *471satisfy the loan…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Hendrick v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. First National Bank v. SladeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. A. John Cohen Ins. Agency v. Middlesex Ins. Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Bagott v. MullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lowe v. AlbertazzieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cook v. CrabtreeTennessee Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API