Legal Opinion

Cook v. Crabtree

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

The controlling issue in this litigation is whether defendant Starling Davis, one of six sureties who guaranteed payment by a corporate debtor of a bank loan, was a cosurety liable for contribution to plaintiffs, who paid the bank, or a subsurety with no obligation to contribute.

On 27 July 1981, Cambridge Investment Corporation [CIC] was chartered for the purpose of forming a travel agency, Travel Unlimited. David Crabtree, D. Wiley Cook and his brother, Sam Cook, III, agreed to invest in CIC; and each contributed $3,333.33 to the corporation’s initial capitalization.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SavageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  2. Kurzman v. SteirMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Cutter v. EmerySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lowe v. AlbertazzieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Johnson v. GuerraFairfax County Circuit Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API