Legal Opinion

Bagott v. Mullen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1869PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Ripley Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtRat, J.

Complaint against appellants, charging, that, in 1864, the State, on relation of Hasselman and another, recovered a judgment against one Vandever, as sheriff, and the appellee, and the appellants, upon an official bond, a copy of which judgment is filed with the complaint; that said Vandever is notoriously insolvent; and that appellee has been compelled to pay said judgment in full, and demands contribution from the appellants.

A sixth paragraph of answer was filed, which averred that process was not served personally on the appellants in the suit upon which the judgment was rendered, and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norton v. CoonsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Warner v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Wiley v. PrattIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Daniel v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
  5. Taylor v. SavageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harman v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Houck v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Paul v. BerryIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Rigler v. Charlotte, Columbia & Augusta RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Horn v. BrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API