State ex rel. Miller v. District Court
North Dakota Supreme Court
Application by the state, on the relation of Andrew Miller, Attorney General, for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Burleigh county, and W. H. Winchester, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtCarmody, J.
This is an application by the attorney general for a writ of certiorari to the district court of Burleigh comity, Sixth Judicial District, and the Hon. W. H. Winchester, judge thereof. It is agreed by counsel that the facts before us are the same facts which would be disclosed by the return to the writ. Our decision, therefore, will not only settle the preliminary question, whether the writ should issue, but also the ultimate question whether the order of the district judge sought to be reviewed by this proceeding, is valid or void.
On the 18th day of November, 1909, the attorney general,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. . BallardNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- State ex rel. Young v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- People v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. BowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- People ex rel. Pixley v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- People v. KempleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Ware v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. HagertyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.