Legal Opinion

F.B. Leopold Co. v. Roberts Filter Manufacturing Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1995No. Civ. A. 92-2427PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT

AMBROSE, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are two Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff, The F.B. Leopold Co. [hereinafter Leopold], pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Leopold initiated this patent infringement action on December 18, 1992. Defendant, Roberts Filter Manufacturing Company [hereinafter Roberts Filter], has filed a counterclaim for declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of Leopold’s patents, and has also asserted claims under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, as well as claims which seek relief for unfair competition, anti-trust, and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Freeman v. SAN DIEGO ASSN. OF REALTORSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Beville v. CurrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Independent Ink, Inc. v. Trident, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
  4. ERBE Electromedizin GmbH v. CANADY TECHNOLOGY LLC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Force Partners, LLC v. KSA Lighting & Controls, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API