Independent Ink, Inc. v. Trident, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MANELLA, District Judge.
I. FACTS
Independent Ink, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) is a distributor and supplier of printer ink and ink products. Trident, Inc. (“Trident”) and Illinois Tool Works, Inc. (“ITW”) (collectively, “Defendants”) manufacture: 1) a patented piezoelectric ink jet printhead, the first of its type; 2) a patented ink container, consisting of a bottle and a valved cap, that attaches to the printhead; and 3) ink specially formulated for use in Trident’s printhead…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Nobody in Particular Presents, Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- In Re Webkinz Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Independent Ink, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.