Legal Opinion

Ozmun v. Burns

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 5, 1989No. 7469PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobson, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a partial judgment rendered on behalf of the named defendant,1 after the trial court granted his motion to dismiss. The plaintiff claims that the court erred (1) in concluding that the notice given to the defendant was insufficient to satisfy the requirements of General Statutes § 13a-144,2 and (2) in not allowing the jury to decide whether the notice was sufficient under the statute. We find no error.

*679The record discloses the following facts. On July 26, 1985, the plaintiff was riding a bicycle on Route 10 in Simsbury; the bicycle struck a hole in the roadway, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Zotta v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  3. Schaap v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Town of Wethersfield v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  5. Shaw v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Bresnan v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Filippi v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Merola v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Murray v. FrankelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API