State v. Shepherd
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
The defendant first assigns as error that the.court failed to instruct the jury as to the effect of insanity or mental weakness on premeditation and deliberation.
The court instructed the jury as to the proper test for determining whether or not defendant was legally sane at the time of the killing. The defendant requested no further instructions when the trial judge made inquiry about it. Our Court has previously ruled on this particular problem in two recent cases, State v. Cooper, 286 N.C. 549, 213 S.E. 2d 305 (1975), and State v. Wetmore, 287 N.C. 344, 215 S.E. 2d 51…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. ShankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- In Re Petition for Writ of ProhibitionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.