Legal Opinion

Acrey v. Bauman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1938No. 27006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The question for determination is whether the trial court erred in admitting this testimony.

It is our opinion that the testimony was inadmissible on the ground that it was calculated to make an appeal to racial prejudice and tended thereby to impair the impartiality of the trial.

It is common knowledge that racial prejudice is easily aroused, and when injected into a case, more often than not, becomes a factor-which controls and dominates the minds of the jurors to the exclusion of any other consideration, preventing their fair and deliberate judgment upon the issues submitted to them for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. H. E. Culbertson Co. v. WardenOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Knisely v. Community Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Suchy v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Croke v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Brown v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Plas v. Holmes Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API