Legal Opinion

Burger & Burger, Inc. v. Murren

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 24, 1987No. 12759; 12760PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether the granting of a motion to disqualify counsel in a civil case is an appealable final judgment. The procedural and factual history of this case is undisputed. After a contract dispute arose, the plaintiff in the first case, Burger & Burger, Inc. (Burger), an insurance company, commenced an action against the defendants, Thomas Murren, a former agent of the company, and Murphy & Murphy, Inc., Murren’s present employer. *662In a separate action, Murren and Murphy & Murphy, Inc., brought a countersuit against Burger. On April 12, 1985, Burger moved to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Bergeron v. MacklerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Maddocks v. RickerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API