Legal Opinion
Bergeron v. Mackler
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 20, 1993No. 14495PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
This is a writ of error1 from an order of the Superior Court granting the request of the *392defendant in error (defendant), Violet Mackler, to disqualify counsel for the plaintiffs in error (plaintiffs), Michael Bergeron, James Downey and Michail Campbell. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly disqualified the law firm of Tarlow, Levy & Droney, P.C. (firm), from representing them as nonparty witnesses in a marital dissolution action relying on the firm’s previous representation of the defendant in a residential house closing. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Board Of Education Of The City Of New York v. Ewald NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- State v. BunkleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Clinard v. BlackwoodTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bernocchi v. ForcucciSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.