Wenke v. Hitchcock
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent David G. Hitchcock, as registrar of voters, to issue to petitioner, and to accept from petitioner for filing, nomination papers for the office of Supervisor of the First Supervisorial District of Orange County. For reasons set forth infra, we have concluded that petitioner is qualified to be a candidate for such office and that, therefore, the writ should issue.
We set forth the undisputed facts. Petitioner is, and at all material times has been an adult citizen and resident of Orange County. For approximately 18 years…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Zeilenga v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Carter v. Commission on Qualifications of Judicial AppointmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Jolicoeur v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Smith v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Koire v. Metro Car WashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- King v. Central BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Long Beach Police Officers Assn. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Thompson v. MellonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.