In Re Calhoun
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Penal Code section 669 1 permits a trial court under certain circumstances to defer for 60 days a decision on whether a defendant with a prior existing conviction should serve his terms . concurrently or consecutively. The trial court in the instant case relied 'upon section 669 in deliberately deferring its sentencing of a defendant convicted of multiple offenses. During the deferral, the court received an ex parte communication from the prosecutor recommending imposition of consecutive sentences; thereafter, the court sentenced the defendant to consecutive terms. As we…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. ZikorusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.