Legal Opinion

In Re Calhoun

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1976No. Crim. 19066PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Penal Code section 669 1 permits a trial court under certain circumstances to defer for 60 days a decision on whether a defendant with a prior existing conviction should serve his terms . concurrently or consecutively. The trial court in the instant case relied 'upon section 669 in deliberately deferring its sentencing of a defendant convicted of multiple offenses. During the deferral, the court received an ex parte communication from the prosecutor recommending imposition of consecutive sentences; thereafter, the court sentenced the defendant to consecutive terms. As we…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. ZikorusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API