Legal Opinion
Rioux v. Daniel International Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 12, 1984No. Civ. 80-0010 PPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION OF DEFENDANT, DANIEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., TO BAR ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE OF SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL MEASURES
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
The Defendant, Daniel International Corporation, filed on January 12, 1984, a motion in limine seeking a pretrial ruling pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 407 as to the admissibility in the course of Plaintiffs case in chief, or in rebuttal, of evidence relevant to showing any change of method used by the Defendant, Daniel International Corporation, to secure vertical concrete pipe risers after the occurrence of the accident in question…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Grenada Steel Industries, Inc. v. Alabama Oxygen Company, Inc. And Sherwood-Selpac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Illinois on May 25, 1979. Appeals of American Airlines, Inc. And McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Garbincius v. Boston Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc., Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Fasanaro v. Mooney Aircraft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Pasternak v. AchornDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1988
- Sulak v. American Eurocopter Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2012
- Morton v. BrockmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.