Legal Opinion

Pasternak v. Achorn

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 25, 1988No. Civ. 86-0280-BPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE

CYR, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a motion in limine to preclude evidence of plaintiff’s nonuse of a seat belt on the issues of comparative negligence and mitigation of damages. A Maine statute renders such evidence inadmissible. See Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 29, section 1368-A (1964). 1

WHETHER THE COURT SHOULD APPLY STATE LAW

The federal courts which have considered the admissibility of evidence of nonuse of seat belts in diversity cases have followed state statutes prohibiting such evidence. In fact, the issue of whether the federal court is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc., Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Ruby Conway v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Dennis C. Sours v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1978
  5. Ramrattan v. Burger King Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Downeast Ventures, Ltd. v. Washington CountyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
  3. Morton v. BrockmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999
  4. Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Wardwell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API