Legal Opinion
Fasanaro v. Mooney Aircraft Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 13, 1988No. C-86-6027 DLJPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION IN LIMINE
JENSEN, District Judge.
I
Defendant Mooney Aircraft Corporation (“Mooney”) has filed a Motion in limine for exclusion of evidence of subsequent remedial measures. The Motion was heard on November 18, 1987. Plaintiff appeared through counsel Gerald C. Stems. Mooney appeared through counsel Terence F. Young and Scott W. Pink. After considering the memoranda and other documents submitted, as well as the oral arguments of counsel, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
II
Plaintiff Patsy L. Fasanaro originally brought this products liability action in California…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Howard Jay Josephs v. Harris Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brazos River Authority v. GE Ionics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- In Re Aircrash In Bali, Indonesia.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- City of Bethel v. PetersAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Fox v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.