Legal Opinion
Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Broad Associates Ltd. Partnership
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 29, 1991No. 9032PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Daly. J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly denied the named defendant’s1 motion to open and modify a judgment of strict foreclosure pursuant to General Statutes § 49-15. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are not disputed. On February 14, 1989, a judgment of strict foreclosure was rendered for the plaintiff with a law day of September 6,1989, set for the defendant. Subsequently, the defendant filed a petition in the Bankruptcy Court which stayed all proceedings. Pursuant to the plaintiff’s motion, the Bankruptcy Court lifted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brand v. WoolsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Melillo v. SpiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- New Haven Savings Bank v. GurlandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Busca v. Nicotra Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Society for Savings v. StramagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- U.S. Bank, N.A., Trustee v. MorawskaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- First Constitution Bank v. Flanders, No. Cv 910310164s (Mar. 22, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995