Legal Opinion
Busca v. Nicotra Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 19, 1989No. 13771PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The sole issue in this mortgage foreclosure is whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining the value of the foreclosed real property and in consequently fixing a law day for the named defendant, owner of the equity of redemption, only four and one-half months from the date of the judgment of foreclosure.1 We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion and, therefore, find no error on the named defendant’s appeal.
The underlying facts are not in dispute. On September 14, 1987, the named defendant, Nicotra Corporation (defendant), executed a promissory note in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Gorra Realty, Inc. v. JetmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Brand v. WoolsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BassfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Broad Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Bowery Savings Bank v. Wasko, No. Cv 92-0329553-S (Nov. 1, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Equity One, Inc. v. ShiversConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014