Legal Opinion

State v. Crosby

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1996No. 950453PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

The Utah Court of Appeals transferred this ease for a determination of whether Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), states a different standard for admitting evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 than we articulated for admission of evidence under Utah Rule of Evidence 702 in State v. Rimmasch, 775 P.2d 388 (Utah 1989), and if so, whether the Daubert standard should be adopted as the governing rule in Utah. Along with this certified question, this case presents three issues on appeal: (1) whether, given…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. People v. BaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. OttUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1997

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API