Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. J. H. Beckman Construction Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1969No. File 10479PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENTTO, Judge.

In this action the state seeks a declaration of rights and duties under a contract awarded after competitive bidding for the building of a highway bridge, the terms of which were altered during the course of construction by agreement of the parties. It is principally interested in the legality of additional compensation allowed the contractor under the modification.

The State of South Dakota accepted the bid of J. H. Beckman Construction Company for the building of the bridge over the Grand River near Mobridge, South Dakota, and entered into a written contract with it for such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kansas City Bridge Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Cuka v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Griffis v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Essington v. BucheleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. England v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northern Improvement Co. v. South Dakota State Highway CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dave Gustafson & Co. v. S.D. Highway CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Dave Gustafson & Co. v. S.D. Highway CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Northern Improvement Co. v. South Dakota State Highway CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Northern Improvement Co. v. South Dakota State Highway CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API