Legal Opinion · Dissent

Northern Improvement Co. v. South Dakota State Highway Commission

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1978No. 11789Published

1DissentWollman, Justice

I agree that plaintiff has no claim under the contract for extra compensation for extra work done. I would hold, however, that the concepts of waiver and estoppel are not available to circumvent the terms of the contract. In the case of England v. State, 61 S.D. 132, 246 N.W. 628, plaintiff argued that its complaint to the district and state highway engineers that certain work was outside the scope of the contract was sufficient to avoid a requirement that a settle*215ment for such work be agreed upon in writing between the contractor and the commission prior to the commencement of the work. In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kansas City Bridge Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Griffis v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  3. England v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State, Department of Social Services v. RodvikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Alexander v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API