Legal Opinion

England v. State

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1933No. File No. 7230PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

The plaintiffs are contractors, and some time prior to May, 1929, examined certain plats, specifications, and' plans relating to certain highway work specified in a notice to contractors to 'be performed on State Trunk Highway No. 63 near the Cheyenne River bridge. The notice to contractors provides, among other things, for certain excavations, to wit: “110,067 C. Y. as Unclassified, 127,169 C. Y. Stas. Overhauling of Excavation, and, 144 C. Y. Structure Excavation.” Thereafter the plaintiffs became the successful 'bidders and entered into a contract with the defendant state the latter' part…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kansas City Bridge Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State Highway Commission v. Green-Boots Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Griffis v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Northern Improvement Co. v. South Dakota State Highway CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State Highway Commission v. J. H. Beckman Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API